Number of Pages: 78

File Size: 12039 KB

File Type: MS Word & PDF

Chapters: 1 - 5



Cretaceous sediments outcropped extensively in the Afikpo sedimentary basins. Detailed geological mapping of Ozizza and environs was undertaken in order to give a detail descriptions of the lithological features, stratigraphic relationships and contacts, sedimentary structures, and their paleontological contents. Sieve analysis, hydrological and palynological analyses of selected outcrop samples were carried out in order to reconstruct the depositional history of the sediments in the area and their provenance, assess the age of sediments and establish their paleoenvironments of deposition, and evaluate the hydrocarbon source rock potential and the degree of thermal maturation. Two main lithological units were encountered, which include sandstone and shale. Result from thesieve analysis indicates that the sandstones in the study areawere mostly deposited in a beach and fluvial settings. Physicochemical results from heavy metals analysis indicated significant concentration of sodium (Na) in the water samples. Results from the palynological investigation revealed a Late Campanian to Earliest Maastrichtian for the sediments, with the following index sporomorphs assemblage:Cingulatisporites ornatus, Zlivisporis blanensis, Distaverrusporites simplex, Longapertites marginatus, Constructipollenites ineffectus, Monocolpites marginatus, Echitriporites trianguliformis,, Buttinia andreevi, and Retidiporites magdalenensis. Environmentally significant palynomorphs indicated that the sediments in the study area were depositedin a marginal marine/ nearshore brackishwater environments of deposition, with minor marine influence. Kerogen analysis shows that all the sediments were mostly dominated by phytoclasts followed by opaque debris and AOM, giving rise to mostly type III kerogen, which are generally immature but havepotential to generate gas.


TITLE PAGE                                                                                                             i

APPROVAL PAGE                                                                                                   ii

DEDICATION                                                                                                           iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS                                                                                       iv

ABSTRACT                                                                                                               v

TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                   vi

LIST OF FIGURES                                                                                                  vii

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION                                                                    13

1.1 LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY                                                                13

1.2 GEOGRAPHY                                                                                                     14

1.2.1 CLIMATE                                                                                                         15

1.2.2 VEGETATION                                                                                                 17

1.2.3 THE PEOPLE                                                                                                   19

1.3 LITERATURE REVIEW                                                                                                19


1.5 STUDY METHODOLOGY                                                                                21

1.5.1 PRELIMINARY STUDIES                                                                             22

1.5.2 FIELD STUDIES                                                                                              22

1.5.3 LABORATORY ANALYSES                                                                         22

CHAPTER TWO: GENERAL GEOLOGIC SETTING                                                24

2.1 GEOMORPHOLOGY                                                                                         26

2.1.1 TOPOGRAPHY                                                                                                            27

2.1.2 DRAINAGE                                                                                                     29

2.2 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING                                                                 32

2.2.1 TECTONIC SETTING                                                                                     33

2.2.2 STRATIGRAPHIC SETTING                                                                         34

2.2.3 EVOLUTION OF THE BENUE TROUGH                                                    34

CHAPTER THREE: LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY                                                 35


3.1.1 NDIBE BEACH SECTION                                                                             36

3.1.2 EHUGBO TECHNICAL COLLEGE SECTION                                            38

3.1.3 SCOTT SPRING NDIBE SECTION                                                               39

3.1.4 UZOEZEALI SECTION                                                                                  41

3.1.5 NNEMOGWU HILL SITE                                                      42

3.1.6 Mcgregor section                                                          43

3.1.7 AMURO/MGBOM SECONDARY SCHOOL SECTION                             44

CHAPTER FOUR: LABORATORY ANALYSES                                             41


4.1 SIEVE ANALYSIS                                                                                            41

4.1.1 METHODOLOGY                                                                                           70

4.1.2 RESULTS                                                                                                          71


4.2 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS                                                             72

4.2.1 METHODOLOGY                                                                                           73

4.2.1 RESULTS                                                                                                          73

4.2.2 PALYNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS                                                                 76

4.3 METHODOLOGY                                                                                              79




4.3.2 KEROGEN ANALYSIS                                                                                79

4.4 METHODOLOGY                                                                                              80

4.4.1 RESULTS                                                                                                          82



5.1 SIEVE INTERPRETATION                                                                               87

5.1.1 HYDROGEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION                                                          89

5.2 PALYNOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION                                                        89


5.2.1 AGE ASSESSMENT/ CORRELATION                                                         90

5.2.2 PALEOENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSITION                                              91

CHAPTER SIX: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS                                        92

REFERENCES                                                                                                          93



Fig.1: Location and accessibility map showing the drainage system of study area   14


Fig.2: Location and accessibility map showing the drainage system of study area   15

Fig. 3: Topography map of the study Area                                                                 23

Fig. 4: Drainage Map of the Study Area.                                                                   24

Fig.5: Albian-Santonian Megatectonic Framework for the Benue Region

(after Murat, 1970 and Kogbe, 1989)                                                 27

Fig. 6: Regional stratigraphic sequence of southeastern part of Nigerian

sedimentary basins (modified after Reyment, 1965; and Murat, 1972).                    29


Fig. 7: Depositional cycles in south-eastern Nigerian sedimentary basins

(Adapted from Reyment, (1965) modified after Petters and Ekweozor,

1986;Nwajide, 1995)                                                                          30

Fig. 8: Outcrop map of the study area.                                                                       32

Fig. 9: Geologic map of the study area                                                                       33

Fig.10: Outcrop of unconsolidated sandstone at Ndibe beach.                                 34

Fig.11: Litholog of outcrop of unconsolidated sandstone at Ndibe beach.               34

Fig.12: Ehugbo technical college section                                                                    35

Fig.13: Litholog of Ehugbo technical college section                                                36

Fig. 14: Scot Spring Ndibe Section                                                                            36

Fig. 15: Litholog of Scot Spring Ndibe Section                                                         37

Fig. 16: Uzuezeali Section                                                                                          38

Fig. 17: Litholog of Uzuezeali Section                                                                       39

Fig. 18: Nnemogwu Section                                                                                       39

Fig. 19: Litholog ofNnemogwu Section                                                                     40

Fig. 20: ugwuugwu McGregor section                                                                       41

Fig. 21: Litholog of ugwuugwu McGregor section                                                    42

Fig. 22: Amuro/Mgbom Secondaryschool Section                                                     42

Fig.23: Litholog ofAmuro/Mgbom Secondaryschool Section                                    43

Fig. 24: Graphic median vs Graphic standard deviation (After Stewart, 1958)        69

Fig. 25: Graphic skewness vs Graphic kurtosis (after Friedman, 1961)                     70

Fig. 26: Graphic standard deviation vs Graphic skewness (after Friedman, 1967)      71

Fig. 27:  Graphic mean size vs Graphic standard deviation

(afterMoiola and Weiser, 1968)                                                                       71

Fig. 28: Graphic meansize vs standard deviation (after Friedman, 19670)                73

Fig. 29: Graphic mean size vs standard deviation

(afterGlaister and Nelson, 1974)                                                                   75

Fig. 30: Cumulative frequency plot of the grain sample L6/S2                                 69

Fig.31: Histogram plot of the weight retained as a function of sieve size                 69

Fig.32: Probability curve of sample L2/S2                                                                  70

Fig. 33: Histogram chart of sample L2/S2                                                                  70

Fig.34: Histogram chart of sample L4/S1                                                                   71

Fig.35:Probability curve for sample L4/S1                                                                 71

Fig. 36:Histogram Chart for sample L6/S1                                                                72

Fig.37:Probability curve for sample L6/S1                                                                 72

Fig. 38: Histogram chart of sample L7/S1                                                                  73

Fig. 39: Probability curve for sampleL3/S3.                                                               73

Fig. 40: Histogram chart of sample L1/S2                                                                  74

Fig. 41: Probability curve for sample L1/S2                                                               75

Fig. 42: shows the laboratory materials including, safety gadgets and

chemical reagents used in the palynological sample processing

at Godfrey Okoye University.                                                                                    97

Fig. 43: Absolute occurrence and distribution of the palynomorphs

in the examined samples.                                                                                82

Fig. 44:Histogram of % frequency distribution of the total Particulate

Organic Matter (POM) present in the examined samples.                              85

Fig. 45:Summary of the kerogen optical assessment and interpretation                     87

Fig. 46: Micrographs of the kerogen slides showing the various particulate

organic matter (POM).                                                                                    88

Fig. 47:  Micrographs of some palynomorphs species recovered from the

examined samples. Magnifications nos. 4 and 8

(X 100 oil immersion), others (X 40)                                                 98




The study area is located along Afikpo-Okigwe axis and bounded by latitudes 5° 51IN and 6°03IN and longitudes 007º51IE and 8° 06I E (Fig. 1), and with an area extent of about 74 sqkm (Fig. 1). The study area is bounded on the north by Afikpo, on the south by Eberiba and on the west by Amasiri town.It covers area such as, Anofia Nkanu, Amangbala and Ebom in Ebonyi State, South Eastern Nigeria. Access to the area is through the roughly east-west Afikpo-Okigwe road, which connects the Okposi-Amaseri-Amoso road at Amasiri. On the outskirts of Afikpo town, this road connects with the Northbound Abakaliki road passing through Akpoha and Abomege. The eastern side of the study area is accessible through the Abomege-Ugep road, which passes through the Cross River at Itigidi to Ugep and Calabar towards the southern part of the study area. Other minor roads link the smaller interior villages from these major roads.  The major roads are tarred while the minor roads are untarred and may not be accessible during the rainy season.    



The study area experiences of two seasons, the rainy and dry seasons. There is however, a short break of one to three times, usually referred to as “August break”. The hottest months are usually between October and March.

Rainfall in this area is evenly distributed and is high, about 190 cm per annum, and 95 % of this takes place between the months of April and October (Ibe and Okeke, 1974). The rate of evaporation from the open surface water as estimated by Mirenenko (1966) is 2cm per annum.

Fig. 1: Location and accessibility map showing the drainage system of study area.

The mapped area falls within the zone of 27o-30o of annual temperature. The climate of this area is classified as a tropical wet and dry savannah climate.


The vegetation of the area ranges from humid tropical rainforest to savannah, with gradation of one form to the other which can be attributed to the relief patternof the area (Fig. 2). Afikpo area belongs to a forest community known as moist lowland forests and is characterized by forests where the conditions are favourable (Ofomata, 1978). The lithological combination and the climate play a part in the vegetation of the area (Igbozurike, 1975). There are considerable disparity in vegetation between the shaley plains and the sandstone ridges. The ridges are generally covered with sparse vegetation while the plains have luxuriant vegetation. This is because the sandstone ridges are permeable and could not hold sufficient water to support luxuriant vegetation while the lowland plains of mud rocks are impermeable and thus retain water very well for crops.

The streams, river courses and lowland of shale beds have fairly thick vegetation and high trees while hill-tops and other dry areas consisting of siltstones and ferruginized sandstones are marked by savannah vegetation and isolated trees. This indicates that the vegetation is controlled by geological factors such as topography, lithology, relief as well as anthropogenic activities. Deforestation has taken place in certain areas where the land is being used for agriculture, industries and other developmental activities.

1.2.3   THE PEOPLE

Afikpo is the birthplace of several accomplished Nigerian men and women. A notable example is the late Dr. Akanu Ibiam of Uwana, one of the first Igbo medical doctors and former Governor of the Eastern Region. Afikpo is a Mecca of ancient Igbo tradition and ceremonial (now antique) masks which have been carefully preserved by the state tourism board. Several archeological findings support the claim that Afikpo civilization existed as far back as the Neolithic age.

The origin of the people of Afikpo like most of their pre-literate counterparts in African is shrouded in obscurity. However, their oral tradition has tried to throw much light on the matter. Now there appears to be a general agreement among the oral sources collected that the original inhabitants were non-Igbo speaking groups called the EGU, the NKALU and the EBIRI. There was also a legend of the existence of a distinct group called the OHAODU.

Fig. 2: Vegetation map of Nigeria showing the study area (after Igbozurike, 1975)

Afikpo tradition is unanimous that the founder of Ehugbo (Afikpo) was Igbo Omaka, otherwise called Igbo–ukwu Omaka. He migrated from Arochukwu in company with other kinsmen who founded Edda, Amasiri and Akpoha. On arrival, he settled at a place called Oroghoro or Amaozara between Amaobolobo and Amaizu. This migration took place probably in the Mid-17th Century. It might be as a result of warfare for historians always talk of the Ibibio–Aro–Akpa war which took place in the Mid-17th Century. The Aro had invited the Akpa from the Cross River valley. The Akpa who were armed with superior weapons called blunderbusses and better organized, helped the Aro to defeat the Ibibio. During and after the war, a lot of migrations took place. The elders of Ehugbo often refer to the Akpa–Ibibio war during which there were dispersions. But the exact identity of this group, Akpa is not known. It was traditionally believed among all the Afikpo people that Igbo Omaka was a very strong warrior. He came with admixture of Igbo culture. Igbo, the warrior launched a war on the Nkalus and the Egus and other non-Igbo original inhabitants most of whom had to flee as mentioned earlier. The rest were assimilated into Ehugbo society. These later migrants had been settling with his authority and permission.This war, it is further said, was referred to as Nkpu Oroghoro, because all the Igbo groups in Ehugbo (Afikpo) sent their war lord to Oroghoro to help in the war effort. It was in this way that the oldest village-group in Ehugbo (Afikpo) called Nkpoghoro derived its name–Nkpu agbaari Oroghoro.



Geological study of the Nigerian sedimentary basins began with the establishment of the Geological Survey of Nigeria (GSN) in colonial times. Early research was motivated by –among other things- the potential of the discovery of mineral deposits. Early accounts of the stratigraphy of the Benue were given by Falconer (1911), Wilson and Bain (1928), Tattam (1944), McConnel (1949), Farrington (1952) and Simpson (1955) among others. Oil exploration began in the years following the Second World War and this gave a big thrust to the studies in the area. Shell BP (1957) mapped most of the sedimentary areas of the country and produced geological maps on the scale of 1:250000.

It was after independence and the establishment of the first universities that more detailed studies began to be carried out. Reyment (1965) described a number of lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic units with giving names to the various formations that are still in use today.

Murat (1972) presented a palaeographic description of the cretaceous and lower tertiary with a mega-tectonic framework. More recent work on the stratigraphy and basin fill of the various depositional basins have been carried by Adeleye and Dessauvagie (1970), Offodile (1976), Kogbe (1982; 1989a; 1989b), Petters (1978), Nwajide (1982), Ojoh (1992), and Riejers (1996) among others.

Along with the more detailed knowledge of the stratigraphy of the Benue trough came theories to account for the evolution of the Benue trough especially within a plate tectonic framework. Authors like King (1959), Grant (1971), Burke, Dessuvagie and Whiteman (1970), Wright (1976), Benkhelil, Guirand, Ponsard and Saugy (1989), and Ojoh (1992) among others proposed theories to account for the evolution of the Benue trough.

The Anambra basin has seen more detailed work in recent times related to it’s having the greatest potential after the Niger delta for oil and gas accumulations. The recent advances in stratigraphy has been applied to the basin by authors like Nwajide and Riejers (1996), Riejers (1996), Obi (2000), Okogbue and Nwajide (2001) Oboh-Ikuenobe, Obi and Jamarillo (2005) and Mode (2002).




The scope of work covers the Late Campanian to Early Maastrichtian Intervals, and located within the Afikpo sub-basin. The field work covers the geological mapping, lithologic characteristics, sedimentology, biostratigraphy, and the production of geologic map on a scale of 1:25000.


The fundamental objective of this work is to give a detail description of the geology of Ozizza and its environs, which can be used in interpreting and delineating the depositional environments, depositional sequence, biostratigraphy, structural features, hydrogeology, and deposits of economic importance in the area. The main objectives include the following:

  • To carry out detailed geologic mapping of Ozizza, with a view to delineating lithologic contacts, stratigraphic relationships, sedimentary structures and paleontological association.
  • To establish the age of sediments and reconstruction the paleoenvironments of deposition.
  • To evaluate the hydrocarbon source rock potential of the sediments and their degree of thermal maturation.
  • To document the hydrogeological characteristics and potentials of the study area.


The methodology employed during the field mapping exercise is the compass and traverse method. The major and minor roads, including foot paths were used to access the exposures. The Global positioning system (G.P.S) was used to establish coordinate location of outcrops on the base map. During the period of the field exercise, G.P.S readings were taken at each location so as to obtain the latitude, longitude and elevation; attitude of beds were made at locations where needed, with the aid of the Brunton compass clinometers. At each outcrop locatiopn, the texture, mineralogy, sedimentary structures and other geologic features were determined. These helped in terms of identification, descriptions and interpretation of the different rock types.

The systematic study of the area was carried out in three phases: preliminary review of literature and visits to outcrops, deskwork and field studies, and laboratory analyses of collected samples.


Reviews of the relevant literature concerning the area of study both on a regional and local scale were consulted to get acquainted with the area. The regional stratigraphic succession and accessibility of the area were depicted in elevation and geologic maps. A reconnaissance exercise was embarked on, featuring outcrop visitation, recording of co -ordinates, getting acquainted with the local traditional authorities and arrangement for accommodation.


This phase of the study includes deskwork and field work, the outcrops were visited in early march 2017. It was carried out in the field with the aim of collecting field data. The data were collected through measurements, photographs, notes and outcrop sampling. Lithological sections and sketches of notable features were made. Collected field samples were appropriately packaged and labelled using sample bags, and masking tapes.

1.5.3 LABORATORY ANALYSES: This phase involves the analysis of selected samples collected from the field in the laboratory for the development of appropriate results


DISCLAIMER: All project works, files and documents posted on this website, are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and some of the works may be crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a reference/citation/guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own study. is a repository of research works where works are uploaded for research guidance. Our aim of providing this work is to help you eradicate the stress of going from one school library to another in search of research materials. This is a legal service because all tertiary institutions permit their students to read previous works, projects, books, articles, journals or papers while developing their own works. This is where the need for literature review comes in. “What a good artist understands is that nothing comes from nowhere. All creative work builds on what came before. Nothing is completely original.” - Austin Kleon. The paid subscription on is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here by any means, and you want it to be removed/credited, please contact us with the web address link to the work. We will reply to and honour every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Administrator (Online)
I am online and ready to help you via WhatsApp chat. Let me know if you need my assistance.