ABSRACT
Plain abdominal radiography is believed to be over utilized as an investigation for acute abdominal complaints. Because of this, the Royal College of Radiologists published guidelines in order to minimise inappropriate requests. The aims of this research were to determine the level of referring clinicians’ adherence to these guidelines while making referrals, to determine whether professional status of the referring clinicians influences their adherence to the guideline, and finally to ascertain if abdominal radiography contribution to patients’ diagnosis is influenced by adherence to the guidelines. In this study, 206 referrals for abdominal radiography with clinical indication that fell within the guidelines were retrospectively collected and analysed. Initial clinical indications were compared with the indications in the guidelines. Also, requests were also analysed according to the professional status of the referring clinicians, and finally, adherence to the guidelines was compared to exams contribution to diagnosis. The results show that out of the 206 referrals used in this study, 133 were made in accordance with the guidelines. From the study, it was a discovered that the professional status of the referring clinicians affects their adherence to the guidelines, most of the non-adherence to the guidelines coming from the Junior Doctors. The study also shows that most of the cases where guidelines were followed contributed positively to patients’ diagnosis, while the reverse is the case where guidelines were not adhered to. Conclusively, from this study, referring clinicians adhere to a large extent to the royal college of radiologist guidelines.
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Distribution of appropriate referrals for abdominal 15
radiography
Table 2: Distribution of inappropriate referrals for abdominal radiography16
Table 3: Distribution of adherence to the guidelines according to the 17
referring clinicians’ professional status
Table 4: Chi-square test to determine the relationship between the
adherence to theguidelines and referring clinicians’ professional status 18
Table 5: Relationship abdominal radiography guidelines and its 19
contribution to patients’ diagnosis
Table 6: Chi-square result of the relationship between abdominal20
radiography guidelines and its contribution to patients’ diagnosis.
TABLE CONTENT
Title page i
Approval page ii
Certification iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledge v
List of tables vi
Abstract vii
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
1.1 Backgrounds 1
1.2 Statement of problems 3
1.3 Objectives of the study 3
1.4 Significance of the study 4
1.5 Scope of the study 4
CHAPTER TWO
Literature review 5
CHAPTER THREE:
3.1Research design 13
3.2 Sources of data 13
3.3 Inclusion criteria 13
3.4 Exclusion criteria 13
3.5 Method of data collection 14
3.6 Data analysis 14
CHAPTER FOUR: Data presentation 15
CHAPTER FIVE
4.1 Discussion 21
4.2 Summary of findings 23
4.3 Conclusion 24
4.4 Recommendations 24
4.5 Limitations of the study 25
4.6 Areas for further research 25
Reference
Appendix
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
- BACKGROUNDS
The performance of plain abdominal radiography is often considered to be an essential requirement for assessing acute abdominal complaints. It is commonly requested for acute medical emergences on patients with non-specific abdominal symptoms and signs1.
Often, plain abdominal radiography is requested routinely as part of the initial investigation on the day of admission, mainly by admitting junior doctors who may not be fully aware of the indications or appreciate the limitations of this investigation towards making diagnosis.
There are only few indications in which the plain abdominal radiography is helpful, such as small bowel obstruction2. Majority of the conditions where these exams were performed have been taken over by newer modalities such as ultrasonography. In addition, only few doctors are aware of the relative high radiation dose patient is exposed to while undergoing plain abdominal radiography.
Patient undergoing plain abdominal radiography receives 35 times the dose they receive during normal chest radiography3. The limitations of plain abdominal radiography are consistently demonstrated in several series where the percentage of diagnostic radiography ranges only 10-20%4,5,6, 7. Inorder to minimize inappropriate requests, unnecessary radiation dose to the patient and to enhance the efficiency of this investigation, the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) issued out clear guidelines for requesting for plain abdominal radiography8.
- STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS
- There is doubt whether the referring clinicians in our hospitalsadhere to the guidelines given by the Royal College of Radiologist for abdominal radiography.
- It is not certain if abdominal radiography contribution towards patients’ diagnosisis associated with adherenceto the guidelines.
- It is not known whether the referring clinicians’ adherence to the Royal College of Radiologists guidelines is associated with their professional status.
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
- To find out if referring clinicians adhere to the Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines for abdominal radiography.
- To determine if abdominal radiography contribution to patients’ diagnosisis associatedwith adherence to the guidelines.
- To find out if professional status of the referring clinicians is associated with their adherence to the guidelines.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The results of the study may assist health policy makers
in developing guidelines for routine plain abdominal radiography utilizations in our locality
- SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This study was carried out on all the patients referred for abdominal radiography at NnammdiAzikiweuniversity teaching hospital (NAUTH), Nnewi, from 2001 to 2011.
DISCLAIMER: All project works, files and documents posted on this website, UniProjectTopics.com are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and some of the works may be crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a reference/citation/guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own study. UniProjectTopics.com is a repository of research works where works are uploaded for research guidance. Our aim of providing this work is to help you eradicate the stress of going from one school library to another in search of research materials. This is a legal service because all tertiary institutions permit their students to read previous works, projects, books, articles, journals or papers while developing their own works. This is where the need for literature review comes in. “What a good artist understands is that nothing comes from nowhere. All creative work builds on what came before. Nothing is completely original.” - Austin Kleon. The paid subscription on UniProjectTopics.com is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here by any means, and you want it to be removed/credited, please contact us with the web address link to the work. We will reply to and honour every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.
